The Coalition of Tri-Lakes Communities Home Page

Ballots
CTLC: Neighbors working together to preserve and enhance quality of life in the Tri-Lakes area

Calendar
Contents/Search
FAQs
History
Links
Projects

Colorado Organization for Victim Assistance

Topics
John Heiser's letter to the Tribune regarding the proposed recall of the Monument Mayor and five of the Trustees
May 15, 2001: Monument Home Rule Charter Election. View the Monument Home Rule Charter Commission's Web Site with draft Charter, Minutes, etc.
November 7, 2000 General Election
Results
Coloradans for Responsible Growth Ballot Initiative (Amendment 24)
State government web page
Some of the Supporting Organizations
Supporters' Web Sites
Some of the Opposing Organizations
Opponents' Web Site
Observations
Recent Articles
Proposed Monument Charter
Taxcut 2000 Ballot Initiative (Amendment 21)
State government web page
El Paso County Treasurer's Analysis of the Impact on Special Districts
UCCS Study on the Impact of Amendment 21
Supporters' Web Site
Opponents Web Sites
Observations
Recent Articles
Coalition No on 21 Committee's Flyer
Tri-Lakes Recreation District Ballot Measure
May 2, 2000 Monument Sanitation District Election Results
May 2, 2000 Tri-Lakes Fire Protection District Candidates and Ballot Issue and Results
April 4, 2000 Election Results
November 7, 2000 General Election

County Election Results. There are over 310,000 registered voters in El Paso County. For the Nov. 7th election, the County received 73,405 requests for absentee ballots. 95% (69,141) of the absentee ballots were returned of which 942 were disqualified because of submission errors. Short summary of the results of the Nov. 7th election: 

Amendment 21 (Taxcut 2000) failed (37% YES, 63% NO)

Amendment 24 (Responsible Growth) failed (30% YES, 70% NO)

Tri-Lakes Recreation District Board members were elected and the District was created (58% YES, 42% NO) and excluded from TABOR (53% YES, 47% NO) but was denied mill levy funding (35% YES, 65% NO) and the ability to increase indebtedness (40% YES, 60% NO).

The Monument Home Rule Charter failed (49% YES, 51% NO).

Coloradans for Responsible Growth Ballot Initiative (also known as Initiative 256 and Amendment 24)

The State government web page on this Initiative has the text, title, and analysis. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat reader to view and print this information.

Some of the Supporting Organizations
American Lands Alliance
American Planning Association-Colorado Chapter
Audubon Society of Colorado
Audubon Society of Greater Denver
Bicycle Colorado
Black Canyon Audubon Society
Citizen Planners of Larimer County
Citizens for El Dorado Canyon
Citizens for Transportation Equity
Center for Environmental Citizenship
Center for Native Ecosystems
Center for Resource Management
Clean Water Action
Colorado Environmental Coalition
Colorado Rail Passengers Association
Colorado Sustainability Project, Inc.
Common Cause Colorado
CoPIRG Citizen Lobby
Crystal Valley Environmental Protection Association
Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
Earthside.com
East West Partners (real estate developers)
Estes Park Association for Responsible Development
Friends of Burnt Mountain
Friends of the Foothills
Friends of the Poudre
Great Old Broads for Wilderness
Green Party of Colorado
High Country Citizens Alliance
INVST-CU Boulder
Lamm, Dick (former Governor)
Land and Water Fund of the Rockies
League of Conservation Voters Education Fund
League of Women Voters of Colorado
Lighthawk
National Wildlife Federation
PLAN Jeffco
San Juan Citizens Alliance
Save the Mesas
Schoettler, Gail (former Lt. Governor)
Sierra Club-Rocky Mountain Chapter
Sinapu
Trout Unlimited - Colorado Chapter
Upper Arkansas & South Platte Project
Valley Alliance for Social & Environmental Responsibility
Western Colorado Congress
Wildlands CPR

Main Supporters' Web Sites

Coloradans for Responsible Growth 

Vote Yes on 24 (Top 10 Myths about the Amendment)

John Fielder

Some of the Opposing Organizations
Action 22
American Electronics Association Mountain States Council
American Institute of Architects, Colorado Chapter
American Subcontractors Association
Apartment Association of Metro Denver
Associated Builders and Contractors
Associated General Contractors of Colorado
Aurora Business Advisory Board
Aurora Chamber of Commerce
Building Trades Council
Castle Rock Chamber of Commerce
Castle Rock Economic Development Council
City of Aurora
Club 20
Colorado AFL/CIO
Colorado Apartment Association
Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry (CACI)
Colorado Association of Homebuilders
Colorado Association of Realtors
Colorado Association of Wheat Growers
Colorado Bankers Association
Colorado Cattlemen's Association
Colorado Contractors Association, Inc.
Colorado Corn Growers Association
Colorado Farm Bureau
Colorado Forum
Colorado Greenhouse and Growers Association
Colorado Health and Hospital Association
Colorado Horse Council
Colorado Hotel and Lodging Association
Colorado Manufactured Housing Association
Colorado Mortgage Lenders Association
Colorado Municipal League
Colorado Restaurant Association
Colorado Rural Electric Association
Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce
Colorado Springs City Council
Colorado Springs Gazette
Colorado Water Congress
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce
Douglas County News Press
Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce
Economic Developers Council of Colorado
Fort Collins Area Chamber of Commerce
Fort Collins Economic Development Council
Fort Morgan Chamber of Commerce
Grand Junction Chamber of Commerce
Habitat for Humanity of Colorado
Jefferson Economic Development Council
Land Title Association of Colorado
National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP)
Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance (NCLA)
Pueblo City Council
The Greater Pueblo Chamber of Commerce
Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce
Western Colorado Associated Builders and Contractors
Main Opponents' Web Site: Coloradans for Responsible Reform

Observations: The Coalition membership is split on this Initiative; however:

Judging from the lists given above, most of the supporters of the Initiative are those who want to reduce sprawl and damage to the environment while opponents are generally those who have an interest in continued rapid development. 

The existence and popularity of this Initiative is an indictment of the present development review/growth management process. It is no surprise that the Initiative is opposed by those involved in that process such as the Colorado Springs City Council and the Colorado Municipal League. 

The opponents of the Initiative have raised over $3.7 Million, ten times as much as the supporters. More than 75% of contributions to the opponents group, Coloradans for Responsible Reform, have come from developers. The Castle Rock Development Co., the Colorado Association of Realtors, and Shea Homes are among those that have donated $100,000 each.

Recent Articles
January 17: Gazette story about the ballot initiative process.
March 21: Responsible Growth Initiative was announced
Press release
Summary 
Full Text
April 24: Denver Post editorial praising the evolution of the Initiative.
May 18: Gazette story on the status of the Initiative.

July 6: Denver Post opinion piece supports Ballot Initiative.

August 1: Gazette letter supports Ballot Initiative.

August 2: Denver Post article: Opponents of the Coloradans for Responsible Growth Ballot Initiative have already raised $1.2M.

August 11: Denver Post article: Coloradans for Responsible Growth Initiative to be on the November ballot.

The Land Rush: Developers seek exclusion from Responsible Growth Initiative.

September 14: Gazette article.

September 15: Denver Post article.

September 16: Gazette article: Colorado Springs received annexation requests for 3,000 acres

September 25: Colorado Business Journal Pro Argument

September 25: Colorado Business Journal Con Argument

September 30: Front page Gazette article "Two Visions of Colorado's Future" on Amendment 24.

October 2: Denver Post reported that 62% of voters polled favor growth measure, 25% oppose

October 5: Colorado Springs Independent article "Size Matters, Sprawl Happens"

October 6: Colorado Business Journal reported that big money funds anti-Amendment 24 group

October 8: Denver Post - Columnist Joanne Ditmer: Amendment 24 is a Logical Step on Growth

October 12: Denver Post article: Growth Initiative Foes Find Error

October 15: Denver Post editorial: Growth Plan Won't Work

October 17: Denver Post article: Growth Groups Claim "Grassroots" Backing

October 17: Denver Post article: Accuracy Isn't the Hallmark of Amendment 24 Ads

October 18: Rocky Mountain News article: Amendment 24 Foes Financing Questioned

October 18: Denver Post article: Amendment 24's Foes Run a Pro-Con Site

October 23: Tri-Lakes Tribune: Heiser's letter supporting Amendment 24

October 24: Revised Local Yes on 24 Flyer  

December 13: Gazette article: Colorado Legislature prepares to consider growth bills

Proposed Monument Charter (read on-line or download the file)

Taxcut 2000 Ballot Initiative (Amendment 21)

The Initiative would add the following new paragraph to Article X, Section 20 of the Constitution (Taxpayers Bill of Rights - TABOR): "(8)(d) A $25 tax cut, increased $25 yearly (to $50, $75 ...), shall lower each tax in each tax bill for each 2001 and later district: utility customer and occupation tax and franchise charge; vehicle sales, use and ownership tax; yearly income tax; property tax; income and property tax equal to yearly revenue from sales and use taxes on food and drink other than tobacco and alcohol; and income tax equal to yearly revenue from estate taxes. (8)(d) tax cuts and state replacement of local revenue shall not lower state or local excess revenue, the state may limit local acts increasing replacement costs, joint income tax returns equal two tax bills, and attorneys fees and costs to enforce (8) (d) shall always be paid to successful plaintiffs only."

The State government web page on this Initiative has the text, title, and analysis. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat reader to view and print this information.

The El Paso County Treasurer's office has prepared an analysis of the impact this amendment would have on each of the special districts in the County. View or download this analysis.

UCCS Center for Colorado Policy Studies Analysis of the Impact of Amendment 21

Supporters' Web Site

Opposition is being organized as the NO on Amendment 21 Campaign, 837 Acoma St., Denver, CO 80204, (303) 892-6621 or (888) 413-6621, FAX (303) 825-1442.

Opponents Web Sites

No on 21

Greater Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce No on 21

Observations: Most Coalition members oppose Amendment 21 because it would probably result in devastating cuts in critical public services:

Fire Protection - Amendment 21 would bankrupt many fire protection districts throughout the state, leaving individual homeowners liable for debts on firefighting equipment and facilities. Furthermore, homeowners insurance, if obtainable at all, would cost much more - offsetting tax savings.

Transportation - Amendment 21 would eliminate at least one-third of the funding for highway and mass transit projects that Colorado voters approved just last November.

Water - Amendment 21 would endanger water supplies by cutting off property tax revenues to water districts that serve many communities on the eastern plains, western slope, and San Luis Valley.

Education - Amendment 21 would make it virtually impossible for the Colorado Legislature to fund public education at the rate of inflation plus student growth. The Pikes Peak Library District has estimated that it would have to close all branches and cease operation within 3-4 years.

Recent Articles

July 24: Denver Post columnist Bob Ewegen: Taxcut 2000 Initiative would bankrupt districts.

July 31: Denver Post columnist Bob Ewegen: Answering criticism of the the July 24th column.

August 7: Denver Post columnist Bob Ewegen: Responding to misrepresentation by the proponents of Taxcut 2000.

September 12: Denver Post article: Doug Bruce defends Taxcut 2000.

September 18: Denver Post columnist Bob Ewegen: Correcting Doug Bruce's Math.

September 21: Doug Bruce's Response.

September 30: Denver Post article: Mayors Unite Against Tax Cuts

October 3: Denver Post reported that 53% of voters polled favor Taxcut 2000, 31% oppose

October 6: Rocky Mountain News article: Governor, firefighters fight tax cut

October 8: Denver Post - Doug Bruce gives 21 reasons to vote for Amendment 21

October 8: Denver Post editorial position: 1,242 reasons to vote against Amendment 21

October 15: Denver Post editorial: Bruce Plan Breeds Chaos 

Coalition No on 21 Committee's Flyer

The No on 21 Committee of the Coalition is distributing a flyer citing their concerns. 

View the flyer on-line

Download the file for off-line viewing and printing. The file is about 106 Kbytes and will take about 35 seconds to download at 28.8. The file is in Microsoft Powerpoint 95. If Powerpoint is not installed on your computer, download and install the free Powerpoint viewer from Microsoft. The viewer can be used to read and print but not edit or create Powerpoint files.

Tri-Lakes Recreation District Ballot Measure

Tri-Rec Web Site

Rec. District Service Plan

Say No to Tri-Rec Flyer

Vince Rusinak's Letter to the Tri-Lakes Tribune

The Coalition of Tri-Lakes Communities Home Page

Home ] Calendar ] Contents/Search ] FAQs ] History ] Links ] Projects ]
[ Ballots ] Baptist Road ] Concrete Plants ] Forest Lakes ] Hay Creek Ranch ] I-25 Corridor ] Jackson Creek ] Knollwood Center ] Misty Acres ] Monument Archives ] Struthers Ranch ] Vision ] Wal-Mart ] Wolf Business Park ]

Interested in the Coalition? Call John at (719) 488-9031 or send e-mail to info@CoalitionTLC.org

Updated Wednesday, August 08, 2001 © Copyright, 2000- 2004. All rights reserved. The Coalition of Tri-Lakes Communities, P.O. Box 1763, Monument, Colorado 80132-1763