Appendix D - Natural Environment
It is important to conduct a comprehensive inventory of the natural environment before responsible planning decisions regarding future development are made. By respecting natural systems and being responsive to their opportunities and constraints, it is possible for Monument to plan growth which minimizes adverse impacts and protects the environmental resources of the community.
The following inventory section identifies specific natural systems and the opportunities and constraints they present to future development patterns. In short, this section becomes a reference which can be used to augment the mapped environmental information (refer to Environmental Constraints Composite, Map 1).
Topographic features, which are formed by the action of physical processes, define natural drainage patterns and the character of the landscape. These drainage patterns and the slope of land-forms are of particular interest when developing planning policies because each offers a unique development opportunity. The following table outlines area-wide development opportunities and constraints relating specifically to land form analysis.
Table 5: Slope Categories - Monument
1. Slight Constraints for Development (0-8% Slope)
| This category covers most of the Town, but is generally concentrated south of Highway 105. | |||||
This
category, merely in terms of slope, is the most appropriate for
development since:
|
Land
Use Opportunities
|
|||||
Development
in these areas should consider:
|
2. Moderate Constraints for Development (9-15% Slope)
| Slopes within this range make up a small percentage of the planning area. The majority of 9-15% slopes are concentrated along the Monument Creek drainageways. | |||||||
Development
in these areas has moderate constraints due to the potential for:
|
|||||||
Land
Use Opportunities:
|
|||||||
Development
in these areas should:
|
3. Moderate to Severe Constraints for Development (16—30% Slope)
| Slopes within this category make up a negligible portion of the planning area and consequently, are not tabulated. |
4. Severe Constraints for Development (30%+ Slope)
| Slopes within this category make up a negligible portion of the planning area and consequently, are not tabulated. |
Source: El Paso County Land Use Department, 1983.
Unfortunately, development and flooding problems are many times closely linked. Flooding, a natural occurrence, results when the capability of a drainageway to accommodate water flow is exceeded. When this happens the water course overflows its banks and inundates an area called a flood plain. Development can exacerbate this situation by covering the ground with impermeable surfaces such as concrete and asphalt. This diminishes the capability of water to filter into the ground and as a result, increased water runoff is directed into streams, consequently enlarging the flood plain.
Monument participates in the National Flood Insurance Program which requires flood-prone areas to be identified and mapped. Further, to be eligible for certain Federal assistance development in specific flood zones must be regulated. Compliance with such mandates is periodically checked by the Federal Government. The following outlines information augmenting Map 1.
Flood hazard studies are undertaken by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine flood insurance rates. These studies are a prerequisite for community eligibility involving guaranteed loan programs such as Housing and Urban Development (HUD) sponsored loans.
Upon request, FEMA will undertake an Emergency Study and map "zone A" or the approximate 100-year flood plain boundaries. This map is derived from aerial photo interpretation. Based on the Emergency Study, an insurance coverage rate is applied to those structures falling within the delineated A zone.
Once the Emergency Study is complete a community becomes eligible for regular program coverage. This involves more detailed studies. Included are: 1) stream gauging data with peak discharge rates and 2) stream cross sections. From this information additional and more detailed flood hazard areas are delineated.
Monument is presently under the Emergency Phase of the Flood Insurance Program. A Flood Hazard Boundary Map delineating areas subject to periodic flooding was prepared for the Town in May 1974. As a requirement of the program, the Town must adopt Flood Insurance Program Regulations, Section 1910.3 (a) and (b). In order to assure continued federal flood insurance for affected properties, it is recommended that the above-cited regulations be adopted by ordinance.
Table 6 is not a complete listing of vegetative types, but it does provide a general indication of plant types within different portions of the Town. The classifications in the table also show tolerance to disturbance by development.
Table 6: Vegetation Classifications - Monument
|
Classification |
Development |
Tolerance to Characteristics |
General Locations |
||||||||||
|
Non-Vegetated and Disturbed Residential |
No Rating |
Low grasses predominate, including meadows, urban lawns, pastures, and non-forested areas |
Uniform distribution throughout the community |
||||||||||
|
Aquatic/Riparian/Meadow |
Low |
Consists of bodies of water and identified by the existence of aquatic plants/Includes willows, alders, rushes, and sedges/Consists primarily of grasses, sedges, and forbs. |
Along streamsides and wetland areas, for example:
|
Source: Colorado State Forest Service, Colorado State University, 1976
Upon analysis, the planning area contains minimal fuel types that warrant a potential for a wildfire hazard. Accordingly, such tabular information is not included in this Plan.
Soil suitability refers to the relative ability of a particular soil to accommodate various kinds of land use activity such as agriculture or construction. To determine the suitability of various soil types, the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) has developed a classification system for inherent soil limitations. The levels of limitation are as follows:
|
Slight - |
Relatively free of limitations, or limitations are easily overcome. |
|
Moderate - |
Limitations need to be recognized, but can be overcome with good management and careful design. |
|
Severe - |
Limitations are severe to make land use questionable as well as economically infeasible. |
Although the type of information contained in Table 7 may be useful for determining the potential of a soil in planning land use, the Town should require a more detailed soil engineering study prior to permitting development.
Table 7: Soil Types - Monument
|
Soil Type |
General Location/ Formation |
Development Suitability |
Limitations to Development |
Planning Recommendations |
|
1 - Alamosa Loam |
Located on flood plains and on alluvial fans (1 to 3% slopes) / Formed in alluvium |
Severe |
High water table and hazard of flooding |
Such areas should remain as open space |
|
38 - Jarre-Tecolote Complex |
Located on alluvial fans (8 to 65% slopes)/Jarre soil is formed in alluvum derived from sandy sediment; Tecolote is formed in alluvial fan sediment derived from acid igneous rock |
Severe |
Shrink-swell, low strength, rapid surface runoff and erosion, moderate frost action, stones |
Special site, road, and building designs
necessary doe to slope, shrink-swell potential, and moderate frost action
potential
Erosion control practices are needed to minimize surface runoff and erosion Heavy equipment needed to move stones |
|
71 - Pring Coarse Sandy Loam |
Located on valley side slopes and on uplands (3 to 8% slopes)/Formed in sandy sediment dervied from arkosic sedi- mentary rock |
Slight to Moderate |
Soils blowing, water erosion, frost action, low strength |
Erosion control practices are needed to control sand blowing and water erosion on construction sites where ground cover has been removed |
|
92 - Tomah-Crowfoot loamy sands |
Located on alluvial fans, hills, and ridges in the uplands (3 to 8% slopes)/Tomah soil is formed in alluvium or residuum derived from arkose beds; Crowfoot in sediment weathered in from arkosic sandstone |
Moderate |
Low Strength, shrink-swell, frost action, soil blowing |
Buildings and roads should be designed to
minimize frost-heave damage
Existing vegetation should be retained |
|
93 - Tomah-Crowfoot loamy sands |
Same as #92 |
Moderate |
Same as #92 |
Same as #92 |
|
101 - Ustic Torrifluvents loamy |
Located on terraces, flood plains and along major drainage- ways |
Severe |
Hazard of flooding |
Such areas should remain as open space |
Source: Soil Survey of El Paso County Area, Colorado, Soil Conservation Service (SCS). June 1981